Attention screen reader users, you are in a mobile optimized view and the content may not be displayed where you expect it to be. To make the screen to its desktop view, please maximize your browser. . These are “data processing agreements” which, as a rule, are an addition to the existing service contract (both parties agree to meet contractual obligations when one provides a service to the other), but only in this case, the endorsement regulates their exploitation of personal data related to its retention (legality of processing, security, confidentiality and data protection assurance), as provided by the DSGVO. Appendix 2 indicates how a data breach should be communicated by the subcontractor to the processing manager, i.e. the information that must be contained in the report format and the details to inform the COntroller after the data breach has been found. Appendix 3 reflects the standard contractual clauses in force (standard contractual clauses) for processors who require the transfer of personal data to third countries. Please note that these may be EU-based transformers that use subprocessings, are not established in the EU or are not processed in the EU (for example. B, a host). In addition, some CSC will “return” to clauses already mentioned in the document (for example.
B responsibility; current legislation Others…) However, this is not a repetition, but an additional decision that results from the transfer of personal data to third countries. The RGPD stipulates that processors must, through a contract, document the mutual obligation (their co-controllers/processors) of all parties involved in the common processing of personal data (even “extended” and “object”). [recitals 81; 108; 109; 168 and section 28; 40.3; 42.2; 46 (2 quinn) and 3a)] As I said before, this is not the “Bible” of the DATAschutz authorities… Far from being… However, after three years of projects to comply with the DMP, this structure reflects the most “accurate” approach I have encountered to date and, in fact, as I have already said, something that is becoming a “standard.” However, many will have their own “internally defined” DPA structures, and since the law does not require a draft contract, I would like to share in this article what becomes a “standard” advised by several “lawyers” who focus on the protection of personal data and the RGPD. We will not follow the feedback directly. Please do not send requests for assistance on this survey. However, there are a few “annexes” here that are “mandatory” while others may or may not be necessary, namely: Appendix 4 will reflect the details of the transfer, which means in detail that, in addition to the existing service delivery contract, all DPA clauses have a direct binding effect on what this contract provides and are therefore part of these contractual clauses.